Polilens
All case studies
Democratic floor urges + Republican votes · Texas House 89R
Technical case study

Which Republicans voted the way Democrats urged?

This study analyzed the Texas House 89R floor video archive to identify each Democratic request to press Yea or Nay, mapped each request to the exact pending House action and corresponding House Record, then compared the requested vote with every Republican member's recorded vote.

Allen Ye

Founder & Software Engineer

founder@polilens.io

437.42

hours across 92 floor videos

318

recorded questions with a Democratic urge

456

explicit Democratic floor urges

88

Republicans compared

Mapped output

One Democratic urge, matched to every Republican vote.

Republican urge-match ranking

Who most often voted the way Democrats urged?

Each match means a Republican cast the Yea or Nay requested in a mapped Democratic floor urge. Open any member to see every urge, pending action, official video, House Record, and Republican vote behind the total.

RankMemberSame voteDifferent voteOther statusMatch rate
1Ryan Guillen

District 31

1151901337.7%
T-2Drew Darby

District 72 · 2-member tie

1101971135.8%
T-2John Lujan

District 118 · 2-member tie

110208034.6%
4Stan Lambert

District 71

1071902136.0%
T-5Charlie Geren

District 99 · 2-member tie

1061644839.3%
T-5Dade Phelan

District 21 · 2-member tie

106203934.3%
7Gary VanDeaver

District 1

103210532.9%
8Angie Chen Button

District 112

1012051233.0%
T-9Ken King

District 88 · 2-member tie

1001694937.2%
T-9Pat Curry

District 56 · 2-member tie

1002021633.1%
T-11Jeff Barry

District 29 · 4-member tie

97218330.8%
T-11Morgan Meyer

District 108 · 4-member tie

97219230.7%
T-11Stan Kitzman

District 85 · 4-member tie

97214731.2%
T-11Tom Craddick

District 82 · 4-member tie

972081331.8%
15Sam Harless

District 126

96215730.9%
16Denise Villalobos

District 34

95220330.2%
T-17Jay Dean

District 7 · 2-member tie

94215930.4%
T-17Paul Dyson

District 14 · 2-member tie

94220429.9%
T-19Keith Bell

District 4 · 2-member tie

932151030.2%
T-19Todd Hunter

District 32 · 2-member tie

932042131.3%
21Janie Lopez

District 37

902082030.2%
22Caroline Fairly

District 87

882012930.4%
T-23Brad Buckley

District 54 · 3-member tie

872042729.9%
T-23Jeff Leach

District 67 · 3-member tie

872121929.1%
T-23Terry M. Wilson

District 20 · 3-member tie

87225627.9%
T-26Candy Noble

District 89 · 3-member tie

85229427.1%
T-26Giovanni Capriglione

District 98 · 3-member tie

85224927.5%
T-26James Frank

District 69 · 3-member tie

85226727.3%
29Don McLaughlin, Jr.

District 80

842211327.5%
T-30Greg Bonnen

District 24 · 2-member tie

832251026.9%
T-30John McQueeney

District 97 · 2-member tie

83228726.7%
T-32Gary Gates

District 28 · 2-member tie

822181827.3%
T-32Trent Ashby

District 9 · 2-member tie

822221427.0%
34Trey Wharton

District 12

81232525.9%
T-35Charles Cunningham

District 127 · 2-member tie

80231725.7%
T-35Stan Gerdes

District 17 · 2-member tie

80233525.6%
T-37Brooks Landgraf

District 81 · 3-member tie

791954428.8%
T-37Marc LaHood

District 121 · 3-member tie

792221726.2%
T-37Matt Shaheen

District 66 · 3-member tie

79237225.0%
T-40Angelia Orr

District 13 · 2-member tie

772172426.2%
T-40John Smithee

District 86 · 2-member tie

772093226.9%
T-42Carl H. Tepper

District 84 · 2-member tie

75238524.0%
T-42Jared Patterson

District 106 · 2-member tie

75241223.7%
44Mark Dorazio

District 122

73239623.4%
T-45Cecil Bell, Jr.

District 3 · 2-member tie

71239822.9%
T-45Richard Hayes

District 57 · 2-member tie

712361123.1%
T-47AJ Louderback

District 30 · 3-member tie

702252323.7%
T-47Cole Hefner

District 5 · 3-member tie

702371122.8%
T-47J.M. Lozano

District 43 · 3-member tie

702044425.5%
T-50Carrie Isaac

District 73 · 3-member tie

69246321.9%
T-50David Spiller

District 68 · 3-member tie

69249021.7%
T-50Mano DeAyala

District 133 · 3-member tie

69240922.3%
T-53Benjamin Bumgarner

District 63 · 2-member tie

67249221.2%
T-53Will Metcalf

District 16 · 2-member tie

67245621.5%
55Caroline Harris Davila

District 52

66250220.9%
T-56Lacey Hull

District 138 · 2-member tie

652401321.3%
T-56Mitch Little

District 65 · 2-member tie

652361721.6%
T-58Keresa Richardson

District 61 · 2-member tie

64249520.4%
T-58Matt Morgan

District 26 · 2-member tie

642391521.1%
T-60David Cook

District 96 · 2-member tie

63248720.3%
T-60Ellen Troxclair

District 19 · 2-member tie

63248720.3%
T-62Helen Kerwin

District 58 · 2-member tie

621946224.2%
T-62Hillary Hickland

District 55 · 2-member tie

62252419.7%
64Katrina Pierson

District 33

612401720.3%
65Valoree Swanson

District 150

59254518.8%
T-66Cody Harris

District 8 · 2-member tie

581699125.6%
T-66Tom Oliverson

District 130 · 2-member tie

582471319.0%
T-68Brent Money

District 2 · 2-member tie

572491218.6%
T-68Terri Leo Wilson

District 23 · 2-member tie

572491218.6%
T-70Dennis Paul

District 129 · 4-member tie

542263819.3%
T-70Mike Schofield

District 132 · 4-member tie

541976721.5%
T-70Tony Tinderholt

District 94 · 4-member tie

54260417.2%
T-70Wes Virdell

District 53 · 4-member tie

542253919.4%
T-74Janis Holt

District 18 · 2-member tie

532263919.0%
T-74Shelley Luther

District 62 · 2-member tie

532551017.2%
T-76Daniel Alders

District 6 · 3-member tie

52259716.7%
T-76Joanne Shofner

District 11 · 3-member tie

52257916.8%
T-76Steve Toth

District 15 · 3-member tie

52264216.5%
79Nate Schatzline

District 93

51259816.5%
80Cody Vasut

District 25

502383017.4%
T-81Alan Schoolcraft

District 44 · 2-member tie

492591015.9%
T-81Andy Hopper

District 64 · 2-member tie

49265415.6%
83Shelby Slawson

District 59

47266515.0%
84David Lowe

District 91

44266814.2%
T-85Brian Harrison

District 10 · 2-member tie

432611414.1%
T-85Mike Olcott

District 60 · 2-member tie

432591614.2%
87Briscoe Cain

District 128

392532613.4%
88Dustin Burrows

District 83

1231533.3%
Apply the workflow

Apply the workflow to the proceedings, members, and issues that matter to your organization.

Scope can cover selected floor sessions, committees, members, bills, or issue areas, with timing defined for the engagement.